Cascadia Project in West Greeley: A Bold Vision or Financial Gamble?

Table of Contents

On April 15, 2025, Greeley City Council voted 5-2 to approve pre-development funding for what’s shaping up to be the largest entertainment development in city history: the Cascadia Project. Touted by supporters as a “generational opportunity” and criticized by others as a “reckless risk,” the $1 billion public-private development is now officially moving forward.

This blog breaks down the details, timeline, projected benefits, and criticisms surrounding this transformative project for West Greeley.


📍 Project Overview

The Cascadia Project, spans 1,800 acres in northwest Greeley—north of U.S. Highway 34 and south of Colorado Highway 257. It includes:

  • An 8,600-seat arena (expandable to 10,000 for concerts), expected to become the new home of the Colorado Eagles in 2028.
  • A 350 room hotel and 100,000 square foot water park.
  • Three sheets of ice for youth and community hockey.
  • A general improvement district (GID) to fund supporting infrastructure.
  • 6,000 residential units beginning construction in 2029.
  • 3.5 million square feet of commercial and retail space.

The development is being led by Martin Lind and his Water Valley Company, with support from the city through a variety of financial tools.


🏗️ Timeline & Phasing

PhaseDescriptionEstimated Dates
Pre-DevelopmentPlanning, financing, bond issuance, and infrastructure design2025
Construction BeginsCore infrastructure and vertical construction2026
Phase 1 CompletionArena, hotel, and water park open to public2028

The city anticipates that full buildout will continue well beyond 2030, especially the residential and retail components.


💰 Financing: A Complex Public-Private Structure

The city’s financial commitment includes:

  • Certificates of Participation (COPs) to fund pre-development.
  • A 501(c)(3) conduit bond structure, allowing for tax-exempt bonds with a “moral obligation” backstop from the city.
  • A General Improvement District (GID) to capture future property tax revenue.
  • Long-term repayment funded by operating revenues from the arena, hotel, and commercial uses.

Importantly, the city is not issuing general obligation bonds, but it is incurring long-term obligations.

Key Figure: The city anticipates making $48 million in payments between 2029 and 2032 before being paid off in 2038​.


✅ Potential Benefits

Supporters highlight the following advantages:

  • Job Creation: Construction and operations are expected to create thousands of temporary and permanent jobs.
  • Tax Revenue: Cascadia could significantly increase sales, lodging, and property tax revenue—supporting city services long-term.
  • Youth Sports Access: New ice rinks could relieve current capacity issues in Northern Colorado’s growing youth hockey scene.
  • Tourism Draw: The arena and water park aim to attract regional visitors, potentially revitalizing the city’s image.

Councilmember Butler called it a “game-changing opportunity” if executed correctly, though he expressed concern about execution and risk​.


❌ Public Criticism & Risks

Opposition voices have been loud and clear, especially during the four-hour public comment session leading up to the council vote.

Top concerns:

  • Lack of Public Vote: Many citizens called for a ballot measure to decide on the funding, arguing the scale warrants direct democratic input.
  • Financial Risk: Critics argue the city is assuming too much debt and deferring essential services to fund an entertainment venue.
  • Equity Issues: There’s concern that Cascadia’s high-end amenities may be inaccessible to many Greeley residents, creating a divide.
  • Downtown Displacement: Business owners worry the project could pull commerce and attention away from Greeley’s historic downtown.
  • Water Supply & Traffic: Several speakers raised environmental and logistical concerns, including increased water demand and traffic congestion.

Councilmembers Olson and DeBoutez both voted against the project, citing long-term fiscal uncertainty and concerns over due diligence​.


🧭 What Happens Next?

  • The city will finalize design plans and continue negotiations with partners like the Colorado Eagles and Northern Colorado Youth Hockey.
  • Infrastructure phasing will be carefully timed alongside growth in the GID.
  • Public engagement is expected to continue, with additional hearings as the city evaluates traffic mitigation, utility planning, and GID expansion.
  • A third-party certification of the financing models and value engineering will be conducted before any major construction begins.

🧠 Final Thoughts

Cascadia could very well be the crown jewel of Northern Colorado—or a cautionary tale of overreach. Whether you’re optimistic, skeptical, or somewhere in between, one thing is certain: Greeley’s future just changed course in a major way.

Hey! Did you know we send out a weekly newsletter with a TON of information about all things Northern Colorado?! If you’re interested in receiving that newsletter, you can sign up for it here.

Share This: